lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 7.0 Release Update
Date Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:49:02 GMT
Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken.

Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch:
http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811

- Mark

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflobbe@apple.com>
wrote:

> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical
> bug.
>
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Ab,
>
> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, depending
> upon the impact, and the time required to fix it.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We
>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait
>> until it’s fixed.
>>
>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate
>> that for an rc as well.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good news!
>>>
>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving
>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on
>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be
>>> the case.
>>>
>>> Anshum
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points”
>>>> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the
>>>> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points
>>>> non-compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m
>>>> willing to discuss on the issues.
>>>>
>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.  I would
>>>> welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>>>
>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which
>>>> there are currently 12:
>>>>
>>>> <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a
>>>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Anshum
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <
>>>> casstargett@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie*
>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he
>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is
>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more
>>>> > weeks?
>>>> >
>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with
>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for
>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>>>> > <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to
>>>> deprecate
>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release
>>>> until
>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas
if
>>>> we
>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix
the
>>>> tests
>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users.
>>>> And
>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more
>>>> volunteers.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how
>>>> people can
>>>> > > help out...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -Hoss
>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>> - Mark
>> about.me/markrmiller
>>
>>
>>
> --
- Mark
about.me/markrmiller

Mime
View raw message