lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Gerlowski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11229) Add a configuration upgrade tool for Solr
Date Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:39:02 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124693#comment-16124693
] 

Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-11229:
----------------------------------------

Hey [~hgadre], took a quick look at the tool you mentioned above.  Had a few questions/suggestions:

- I noticed that the TODO list in the README.md doesn't mention anything about Windows support.
 Is a Windows version of this script in the scope of this JIRA?  Or is the idea that it'd
be added as a part of a separate JIRA later on?
- I'm curious about the choice of XSLT here.  XSLT isn't rocket science, but it does have
its traps, and it's another thing maintainers (and users) will have to dig into.  At a quick
glance, much of the XSLT logic could also be done with xpath (in bash, or invoked from Java-land)...though
it's totally possible I missed something.  Did you consider the maintenance tradeoff between
XSLT and Java?  Or the test-ability tradeoff?  Or is there maybe a reason I'm missing that
makes XSLT required?
- I notice that [ConfigUpgradeTool|https://github.com/hgadre/solr-upgrade-tool/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/config/upgrade/ConfigUpgradeTool.java]
mimics but doesnt technically implement the Solr [Tool|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/93ed4770ac82eb732c7409f82d02009e0fabe390/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrCLI.java#L139]
interface.  Is the idea that as this makes its way into Solr, it would actually implement
that interface?  Or is it coincidence that those classes look similar.  This is not a suggestion
or a critique; just trying to understand the code a little better.

> Add a configuration upgrade tool for Solr
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11229
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 6.6
>            Reporter: Hrishikesh Gadre
>
> Despite widespread enterprise adoption, Solr lacks automated upgrade tooling. It has
long been a challenge for users to understand the implications of a Solr upgrade. Users must
manually review the Solr release notes to identify configuration changes either to fix backwards
incompatibilities or to utilize latest features in the new version. Additionally, users must
identify a way to migrate existing index data to the new version (either via an index upgrade
or re-indexing the raw data).
> Solr config upgrade tool aims to simplify the upgrade process by providing upgrade instructions
tailored to your configuration. These instructions can help you to answer following questions
> - Does my Solr configuration have any backwards incompatible sections? If yes which ones?
> - For each of the incompatibility - what do I need to do to fix this incompatibility?
Where can I get more information about why this incompatibility was introduced (e.g. references
to Lucene/Solr jiras)?
> - Are there any changes in Lucene/Solr which would require me to do a full reindexing
OR can I get away with an index upgrade?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message