lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexandre Rafalovitch (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11490) Add @since javadoc tags to the interesting Solr/Lucene classes
Date Thu, 03 May 2018 15:36:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16462616#comment-16462616
] 

Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-11490:
----------------------------------------------

Ok. But then I really don't get your proposal. What would you be ok with tagging - for example
- PatternTokenizerFactory?

"3.1" is not valid

"pre-3.1 " you are blocking

nothing is confusing to newbies, in my opinion, so that's what I am trying to avoid

Do we have something between us that is not -1?

 

> Add @since javadoc tags to the interesting Solr/Lucene classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Assignee: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Priority: Minor
>
> As per the discussion on the dev list, it may be useful to add Javadoc since tags to
significant (or even all) Java files.
> For user-facing files (such as analyzers, URPs, stream evaluators, etc) it would be useful
when trying to identifying whether a particular class only comes later than user's particular
version.
> For other classes, it may be useful for historical reasons.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message