lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lucky Sharma (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-5211) updating parent as childless makes old children orphans
Date Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:11:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Lucky Sharma updated SOLR-5211:
-------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: Yes, that will take 2 calls, I have implemented this with 7.2.1 and 6.6, 
Patch is attached in this  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13062.)

> updating parent as childless makes old children orphans
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 4.5, 6.0
>            Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 8.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-5211.patch, SOLR-5211.patch, SOLR-5211.patch, SOLR-5211.patch,
SOLR-5211.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 3h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> if I have parent with children in the index, I can send update omitting children. as
a result old children become orphaned. 
> I suppose separate \_root_ fields makes much trouble. I propose to extend notion of uniqueKey,
and let it spans across blocks that makes updates unambiguous.  
> WDYT? Do you like to see a test proves this issue?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message