lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicholas Knize (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8621) Move LatLonShape out of sandbox
Date Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:33:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16732295#comment-16732295
] 

Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-8621:
----------------------------------------

+1

I can take this one. I vote:
 # Move {{LatLonShape}} to {{core}} as a companion to {{LatLonPoint}}
 # In a separate issue, refactor (or remove where appropriate) the two remaining classes ({{GeoRelationUtils && {{MortonEncoder)}}}} from
the {{spatial}} module to either the {{core}} or {{spatial-extras module}}
 # Remove the {{spatial}} module 

 We can do the refactor for 8.0 and keep it in sandbox for 7.7 leaving the 7.x line consistent?

 

> Move LatLonShape out of sandbox
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8621
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> LatLonShape has matured a lot over the last months, I'd like to start thinking about
moving it out of sandbox so that it doesn't stay there for too long like what happened to
LatLonPoint. I am pretty happy with the current encoding. To my knowledge, we might just need
to do a minor modification because of 
> LUCENE-8620.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message