lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Erick Erickson (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
Date Sat, 18 May 2019 19:22:00 GMT


Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-12697:

OK. I confess I didn't dive into the entire process, on a quick review it caught my eye 'cause
it looked a bit like fetching the stored doc in a collector, which is an anti-pattern.

Also making it not as bad is that aside from the documentCache, the page containing the compressed
data will probably be in memory even if it's accessed multiple times. The decompression set
would cause extra work in that case.

I'm not quite sure how the documentCache would be populated, and don't have time right now
to check whether it's part of this workflow or need an explicit call. Just a cautionary note
for you to check that this code would insert the doc in the cache if you're expecting it to
be used.

> pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
> --------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-12697
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: contrib - LTR
>            Reporter: Stanislav Livotov
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch,
> [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688:
> bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored false). Please
also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues it is working not optimal because
it is extracting just one field from the stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for
such usecases. ...
> (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.)

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message