lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashwin Jayaprakash <ashwin.jayaprak...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene vs Sphinx
Date Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:20:04 GMT
The results here might prove useful -
http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/

Ashwin Jayaprakash.


On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:01 AM, ManojPatel <patelmanojb2000@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I have large amount of data and I want to run my search query on different
> servers. How can I run lucene search engine on different server as
> distributed application.
>
>
>
> Ted Dunning wrote:
> >
> > For my own purposes, there is no question since I need huge amounts of
> > flexibility, high scalability, have data that is not in SQL and am not
> > interested in a large C++ program in my production area.
> >
> > Others will have differing points of view.  I worry that the Sphinx
> people
> > say that Sphinx is necessarily faster because it is written in C++.  I
> > note
> > also that they don't seem to understand how SOLR massively simplifies the
> > deployment of Lucene for most applications.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:59 PM, ManojPatel
> > <patelmanojb2000@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> hi i am new in search development. I want to know which one is best from
> >> Lucene and (Sphinx with Ispell).
> >> Answer of this message will helpful to developer who are started working
> >> on
> >> search.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://old.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Sphinx-tp27106508p27106508.html
> >> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ted Dunning, CTO
> > DeepDyve
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Sphinx-tp27106508p27110849.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message