lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Date Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:30:29 GMT

On Feb 28, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Busch wrote:

> I'm not very happy with this proposal. I certainly understand what is
> being tried to achieve though. I'd like to see a tighter integration
> and communication between Lucene core and SOLR too, but the proposed
> requirements seem much too strict. For example, I think it's a good
> idea for SOLR to ride on Lucene's trunk again. This will show
> potential problems of API changes and new features in Lucene much more
> quickly. It will also help SOLR to use new Lucene features much more quickly.
> However, I'm -1 for these points:
> * When a change it committed to Lucene, it must pass all Solr tests.

Not sure why more tests would be a negative.  The Solr tests exercise quite a bit of Lucene
functionality as well.

View raw message