lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Problems with sandbox - can't find org.apache.lucene.store.IndexInput
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2006 02:02:39 GMT
Trunk of Lucene is very stable, more so than 1.4.3 I've heard.

Is 1.9 release close?  Hard to even say.  It could be.  No  
substantial changes to the trunk before 1.9 is officially released  
are planned that I know of.

	Erik


On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Colin Young wrote:

> That would probably explain things. Is 1.9 close, or are we still
> talking months aways? Unfortunately, what I'm trying to do is use the
> code for Berkeley DB Java Edition which, best as I can tell was only
> ported against the 1.9 code, so it looks like my choices are to do the
> port myself, or check out 1.9 to see what the current issues and  
> and see
> how stable it is for my purposes.
>
> Thanks
>
> Colin Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> Sent: 2 January, 2006 05:12
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Problems with sandbox - can't find
> org.apache.lucene.store.IndexInput
>
> I haven't checked the specifics, but many of the contrib (the  
> "sandbox"
> is the old name for it) projects have upgraded their latest code to be
> against the trunk of Lucene, which is destined to be Lucene 1.9.   
> You'll
> need to either grab a previous JAR built before the codebase  
> changed, or
> upgrade yourself to the trunk of Lucene's subversion repository all  
> the
> way around.
>
> 	Erik
>
>
> On Dec 31, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Colin Young wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to compile Lucene with some sandbox code --
>> specifically the Berkely DB index storage -- and I'm running into and
>> issue where the code is attempting to import IndexInput (apparently
>> located in
>> org.apache.lucene.store.IndexInput) but I can't find it in the source
>> anywhere. I'm not sure if the sandbox code is maybe using a more
>> recent version of the Lucene code, or if I'm missing something
>> obvious. My personaly guess is that it's the latter.
>>
>> I'm using Lucene 1.4.3 source and the db directory from the source
>> repository at the apache site.
>>
>> Thanks for any tips.
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> Notice: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
>> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
>> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>> sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> Notice: This email message is for the sole use of the intended  
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged  
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or  
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,  
> please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of  
> the original message.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message