lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zeynep P." <>
Subject Re: pruning package- pruneAllPositions
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:42:42 GMT


Thanks for your fix. I used it but I think there is something wrong with the
fix!!? because
I am using LATimes collection and with epsilon = 0.1 and k =10 I got 97%
pruned index. It means 3% of index left unchanged after pruning. In the the
original paper, "Static index pruning for IR systems", for the same data set
with the same parameters, they have 36.4%. Has enyone used this package with
LATimes dataset? 

Thanks in advance,
Best regards


View this message in context:
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message