lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Oliver Xu \(Aigine Co\)" <oliver...@aigine.com>
Subject 答复: Smart Chinese Analyzer Performance
Date Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:08:29 GMT
You may want to try IKAnalyzer which what I have used for years. Never see a
delay with this analyzer as you mentioned.

Oliver

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: java-user-return-56896-oliver.xu=aigine.com@lucene.apache.org
[mailto:java-user-return-56896-oliver.xu=aigine.com@lucene.apache.org] 代表
Erick Erickson
发送时间: 2013年9月6日 21:07
收件人: java-user
主题: Re: Smart Chinese Analyzer Performance

Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction in
memory used for identical data, so I'd say so. The CHANGES.txt is where I'd
look to see if anything mentioned is worth your time.

Not to mention SolrCloud...

Erick


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Darren Hoffman <darren@jnamics.com> wrote:

> I am using the SmartChineseAnalyzer in v3.6 but accessing or instantiating
> it for the first time takes 10 to 15 seconds before it does anything. I do
> not see this huge delay with StandardAnalyzer.
>
> Is it loading a cache? Is there someway to speed it up?
>
> I am currently using Lucene 3.6 and am trying to upgrade to 4.4 but
> IntelliJ
> does not currently support SPI services.
>
> Does 4.4 offer substantial performance improvements that I should take the
> time to upgrade and work around the IntelliJ shortfall?
>
> Thanks,
> Darren
>
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message