lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Toke Eskildsen ...@statsbiblioteket.dk>
Subject Re: NewBie To Lucene || Perfect configuration on a 64 bit server
Date Tue, 20 May 2014 10:18:07 GMT
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 11:56 +0200, Shruthi wrote:

Toke:
> Is 20 second an acceptable response time for your users? 
> 
> Shruthi: Its definitely not acceptable. PFA the piece of code that we
> are using..Its taking 20seconds. That’s why I drafted this ticket to
> see where I was going wrong.

Indexing 1000 documents/sec in Lucene is quite common, so even taking
into account large documents, 20 seconds sounds like quite a bit.

> Shruthi: Well,  its two stage process: Client is looking at
> historical data based on a parameters like names, dates,MRN, fields
> etc.. SO the query actually gets the data set fulfilling the
> requirements
> 
> If client is interested in doing a text search then he would pass the
> search phrase on the result set.

So it is not possible for a client to perform a broad phrase search to
start with. And it sounds like your DB-queries are all simple matching?
No complex joins and such? If so, this calls even more for a full
Lucene-index solution, which handles all aspect of the search process.
> 
- Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message