lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: encoding in byteref?
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:25:21 GMT
It's partially right!

E.g. IndexWriter will use less memory, and so you'll get better indexing
throughput with a ShortPoint and BytePoint.

But index size will be the same, because Lucene's default codec does a good
job compressing these values.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Cristian Lorenzetto <
cristian.lorenzetto@gmail.com> wrote:

> sorry but I was developping a shortPoint and BytePoint for less using less
> memory space. it is wrong?
>
> 2016-08-09 22:01 GMT+02:00 Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>:
>
> > It's best to index numeric using the new dimensional points, e.g.
> IntPoint.
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Cristian Lorenzetto <
> > cristian.lorenzetto@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > how to encode a short or a byte type in byteRef in lucene 6.1?
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message