lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SuppressForbidden for anonymous classes
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2019 03:07:57 GMT
Hi
forbiddenapis itself is an independent project, so maybe the github repo
for it is the right place for you (since it seems the code is not related
to Lucene)?


2019年7月17日(水) 2:05 elbek kamoliddinov <elbek.dev@gmail.com>:

> Hello everyone.
> We use Lucene's nice forbidden api check tool. I wonder if anonymous
> classes could be supressed using supress annotation. For example:
>
> httpService = new HttpService(...) {
>     @Override
>     @SuppressForbidden(reason = "Sun's HTTP server usage")
>     protected HttpHandler createHandler(...) {
>         return new HttpHandler(...) {
>             @Override
>             protected void handle(HttpExchange he) {
>                 *...*
>             }
>         };
>     }
> };
>
> when I run check for this code I get:
>    ERROR: Forbidden interface use: com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpHandler
> [non-portable or internal runtime class]
>
> Since createHandler method already has supress annotation, I was expecting
> it would be supressed. Any way to supress this without creating separate
> class?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Elbek.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message