lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jason rutherglen <jasonhus...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: To cluster, or not to cluster...
Date Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:15:56 GMT
Hi Clay,

The question was:

"Hi Jason,

Would that not mean if one of the master indexes went down then a subset
of data would be offline?

Rob."

I think if you wanted to run redundant masters (for some reason unknown at this time) this
might be one solution.  Possibly if you had multiple data centers.

----- Original Message ----
From: Clay Webster <webster.lists@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; jason rutherglen <jasonhusong@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 8:23:30 AM
Subject: Re: To cluster, or not to cluster...

Jason,

I'm not following why you suggesting having multiple masters (and updating multiple masters).
 I can see an advantage and lots of disadvantages.  What is the problem you're suggesting
this could address?

 --cw

 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message