lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Au" <bill.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Java heap space
Date Tue, 09 May 2006 22:00:06 GMT
Sorry, hit the wrong key before...

FYI, I have just committed all the changes related to the Jetty downgrade
into SVN.
Let me know if you notice anything problems.

Bill

On 5/9/06, Bill Au <bill.w.au@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, I have just committed the a
>
>
> On 5/8/06, Bill Au <bill.w.au@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was able to produce an OutOfMemoryError using Yonik's python script
> > with Jetty 6.
> > I was not able to do so with Jetty 5.1.11RC0, the latest stable
> > version.  So that's the
> > version of Jetty with which I will downgrade the Solr example app to.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > On 5/5/06, Erik Hatcher < erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Along these lines, locally I've been using the latest stable version
> > > of Jetty and it has worked fine, but I did see an "out of memory"
> > > exception the other day but have not seen it since so I'm not sure
> > > what caused it.
> > >
> > > Moving to Tomcat, as long as we can configure it to be as lightweight
> > > as possible, is quite fine to me as well.
> > >
> > >         Erik
> > >
> > >
> > > On May 5, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> > >
> > > > There seems to be a fair number of folks using the jetty with the
> > > > example
> > > > app
> > > > as oppose to using Solr with their own appserver.  So I think it is
> > > > best to
> > > > use a stable version of Jetty instead of the beta.  If no one
> > > > objects, I can
> > > > go ahead and take care of this.
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > On 5/4/06, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I verified that Tomcat 5.5.17 doesn't experience this problem.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Yonik
> > > >>
> > > >> On 5/4/06, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > On 5/3/06, Yonik Seeley < yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > I just tried sending in 100,000 deletes and it didn't cause
a
> > > >> problem:
> > > >> > > the memory grew from 22M to 30M.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Random thought: perhaps it has something to do with how
you are
> > >
> > > >> > > sending your requests?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Yep, I was able to reproduce a memory problem w/ Jetty on Linux
> > > >> when
> > > >> > using non-persistent connections (closed after each
> > > request).  The
> > > >> > same 100,000 deletes blew up the JVM to 1GB heap.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > So this looks like it could be a Jetty problem (shame on me for
> > > >> using a
> > > >> beta).
> > > >> > I'm still not quite sure what changed in Solr that could make
it
> > > >> > appear in later version and not in earlier versions though...
the
> > > >> > version of Jetty is the same.
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message