lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:23:41 GMT

On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Erik, am I get you right that you want to connect to jmx via an extern
> webapplication which acts as an admin interface (written in ruby or
> whatever) or are you pointing to a http/XML connector for jmx?

Right.  I'd love to provide Solr applications using Ruby on Rails  
(Solr on Rails, heh) with all the information it can get from Solr.

	Erik


> JSR-160 permits extensions to the way in which communication is done
> between the client and the server. Basic implementations are using the
> mandatory RMI-based implementation required by the JSR-160
> specification (IIOP and JRMP) and the (optional) JMXMP. By using other
> providers or JMX implementations (such as MX4J) you can take advantage
> of protocols like SOAP, Hessian, Burlap over simple HTTP or SSL and
> others. (http://mx4j.sourceforge.net)
>
> best regards simon
>
>
>
> On 9/27/06, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>> Ah, so I'm beginning to get it.  If we build Solr with JMX support,
>> the admin HTTP/XML(err, Ruby) interface could be written into the JMX
>> HTTP adapter as a separate web application, and allowing users to
>> plug it in or not.  If I'm understanding that correctly then I'm
>> quite +1 on JMX!  And I suppose some of these adapters already have
>> built in web service interfaces.
>>
>>         Erik
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:20 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> > @Otis: I suggest we go a bit more in detail about the features solr
>> > should expose via JMX and talk about the contribution. I'd love to
>> > extend solr with more JMX support.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9/27/06, Yonik Seeley <yonik@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> On 9/26/06, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > On the other hand, some people I talked to also expressed
>> >> interest in JMX, so I'd encourage Simon to make that contribution.
>> >>
>> >> I'm also interested in JMX.
>> >> It has different adapters, including an HTTP one AFAIK, but I  
>> don't
>> >> know how easy it is to use.
>> >
>> > The application should only provide mbeans as an interface for  
>> the JMX
>> > kernel to expose these interfaces to the adapter. Which adapter you
>> > use depends on you personal preferences. There are lots of JMX  
>> Monitor
>> > apps around with http adaptors like mx4j (http:// 
>> mx4j.sourceforge.net)
>> > if deployed in the same container all mbeans are exposed to the
>> > connector via the mbean registry / server.
>> >
>> > @Yonik: What are you interests in JMX?
>> >
>> > best regards Simon
>> >>
>> >> -Yonik
>> >>
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message