lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Au" <bill.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JVM random crashes
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:08:31 GMT
Seems like this maybe a JVM bug:

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6500147

http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=659990&messageID=3876052

Have you tried using a different garbage collector?

Bill

On 3/3/07, Jed Reynolds <lists@benrey.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > On 3/3/07, Dimitar Ouzounov <dimitar.ouzounov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> But what hardware problem could it be? Tomorrow I'll make sure that the
> >> memory is fine, but nothing
> >> else comes to my mind.
> >
> > Memory, motherboard, etc.
> > Try http://www.memtest86.com/ to test this.
> >
> >> It may be OS-related - probably a buggy version of
> >> some library. But which library?
> >
> > Yep, we've seen that in the past.
> > I'd recommend going with OS versions that vendors test with.
> > The commercial RHEL or the free clone of it http://www.centos.org/,
> > would be my recommendation.
> >
>
> I'm running a lot of CentOS 4.4 myself, on i686 and x86_64 processors.
> I'm testing out Solr on an i686 with JDK 1.5 and I'm running a
> production copy of Nutch on x86_64 JDK 1.5, Tomcat 1.5. It's been rock
> solid.
>
> From trying to install Java in the past on FC5, I read a lot about how
> you had to be rather careful to make absolutely certain that you had no
> conflicting gjc libs in your path. If this is a production box, I'd got
> with a longer-supported OS than FC6. If the server is only for searching
> and apache, I don't think FC6 will give you any noticeable performance
> boost over CentOS 4.4. FC6's performance enhancements with
> glibc-hash-binding won't affect a JVM.
>
>
> Jed
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message