lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Runo <mr...@zappos.com>
Subject Re: [SPAM] [poll] Change logging to SLF4J?
Date Mon, 19 May 2008 20:32:38 GMT
I just read through the dev list's thread.. and I'm voting for SLF4J  
as well.

Thanks!

Matthew Runo
Software Developer
Zappos.com
702.943.7833

On May 6, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Hello-
>
> There has been a long running thread on solr-dev proposing switching
> the logging system to use something other then JDK logging.
> http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-td16836646.html
> http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-td13747253.html
>
> We are considering using http://www.slf4j.org/.  Check:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560
>
> The "pro" argument is that:
> * SLFJ allows more flexibility for people using solr outside the
> canned .war to configure logging without touching JDK logging.
>
> The "con" argument goes something like:
> * JDK logging is already is the standard logging framework.
> * JDK logging is already in in use.
> * SLF4J adds another dependency (for something that already works)
>
> On the dev lists there are a strong opinions on either side, but we
> would like to get a larger sampling of option and validation before
> making this change.
>
> [  ] Keep solr logging as it is.  (JDK Logging)
> [  ] Use SLF4J.
>
> As an bonus question (this time fill in the blank):
> I have tried SOLR-560 with my logging system and  
> ___________________________.
>
> thanks
> ryan
>


Mime
View raw message