lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Preetam Rao" <blogathan....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: estimating memory needed for solr instances...
Date Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:48:19 GMT
Oops. Sorry for the typo. I will be careful next time.
Thanks a lot for digging out the old thread :-)
 It was helpful.

Should we remove the option "useFilterForSortedQuery" altogether if its not
being used anymore ?

-------
Preetam

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Chris Harris <ryguasu@gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn't know what option was being referred to here, but I eventually
> figured it out. If anyone else was confused, the option is called
> useFilterForSortedQuery, you can set it via solrconfig.xml, and, at
> least according to Yonik in late 2006, you probably won't want to
> enable it even if you *do* sort by something other than score:
>
>
> http://www.nabble.com/try-setting-useFilterForSortedQuery-to-false-td7822871.html#a7822871
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Preetam Rao <blogathan.rao@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Since we do not sort the results, the sort will be by score which
> eliminates
> > the option "userFiterFprSortedQuerries".
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message