lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Multiple Update servers
Date Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:29:29 GMT
SAN (or NAS if you can live with its performance) is one way.  Oh course, the SAN would have
to have redundant hw, too - no use in having multiple and redundant disks if you only have
1 controller, for example.  Another options (that I have not tried) is DRBD.  Whatever the
case, you need to have only 1 active master.  Have a look at one of the comments towards the
end of SOLR-561 for a decent description of how this could be set up.  ZooKeeper might help
with active/standby coordination, too, I imagine.


Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



----- Original Message ----
> From: Rakesh Godhani <rgodhani@sermo.com>
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:25:00 PM
> Subject: Multiple Update servers
> 
> 
> Hi, we are currently evaluating Solr and have been browsing the archives for
> one particular issue but can¹t seem to find the answer, so please forgive me
> if I¹m asking a repetitive question.  We like the idea of having multiple
> slave servers serving up queries and a master performing updates.  However
> the the issue for us there is no redundancy for the master.  So a couple of
> questions:
> 
> 1. Can there be multiple masters (or update servers) sharing the same index
> files, performing updates at the same time (ie. Hosting the index on a SAN)?
> 
> 2. Is there a recommended architecture utilizing a SAN.   (For example 2
> slaves and 2 masters sharing a SAN).  We current don¹t have that many
> records ­ prob about a million and growing.  We are mainly concerned about
> redundancy, then performance.
> 
> Thanks 
> -Rakesh


Mime
View raw message