lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ninad Raut <hbase.user.ni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Transfer of Index Vs HTTP GET Vs Embedded Solr -- Urgent Help
Date Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:49:07 GMT
Hi Noble,
Can you explain a bit  more on how to use Solr "out of the box". I am
looking at ways to design the UI for remote application quickly and with
less problems.
Also could you elaborate more on what can go wrong with the first option?
Thanks.

2009/8/6 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <noble.paul@corp.aol.com>

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Ninad Raut<hbase.user.ninad@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a search engine on Solr. Also I have a remote web application
> which
> > will be using the Solr Indexes for search.
> > I have three scenarios:
> > 1) Transfer the Indexes to the Remote Application.
> >
> >   - This will reduce load on the actual solr server and make seraches
> >   faster.
> >   - Need to write some code to transfer the index
> >   - Need to double my effort to update,merge,optimize index
> >
> > 2)Use HTTP GET
> >
> >   - Will increase load on the Solr server
> >   - No extra code needed for transfer
> This by far is the best solution. ecause you do not have to do any
> work at all. It all works out of the box and that is what everyone
> uses
> >
> > 3) Embedded Serach
> >
> >   - Use SolrJ for querying
> >
> > I want to know which is the best approach.
> > Regards,
> > Ninad Raut.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message