lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Conover <scono...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: trie fields and sortMissingLast
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:39:59 GMT
I just noticed this comment in the default schema:

<!--
       These types should only be used for back compatibility with existing
       indexes, or if "sortMissingLast" functionality is needed. Use
Trie based fields instead.
    -->

Does that mean TrieFields are never going to get sortMissingLast?

Do you all think that a reasonable strategy is to use a copyField and
use "s" fields for sorting (only), and trie for everything else?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Steve Conover <sconover@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that trie fields don't support
> sortMissingLast (my tests show that they don't).  If not, is there any
> plan for adding it in?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>

Mime
View raw message