lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Conover <>
Subject Re: trie fields and sortMissingLast
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:39:59 GMT
I just noticed this comment in the default schema:

       These types should only be used for back compatibility with existing
       indexes, or if "sortMissingLast" functionality is needed. Use
Trie based fields instead.

Does that mean TrieFields are never going to get sortMissingLast?

Do you all think that a reasonable strategy is to use a copyField and
use "s" fields for sorting (only), and trie for everything else?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Steve Conover <> wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that trie fields don't support
> sortMissingLast (my tests show that they don't).  If not, is there any
> plan for adding it in?
> Regards,
> Steve

View raw message