lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Scoring for specific field queries
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:38:23 GMT
Filters? I did not mean filters at all.
I am in a mad rush right now, but on the face of it your field definitions
look right.

This is what I asked for -
q=(autoComplete2:cha^10 autoComplete:cha)

Lemme know if this does not work for you.

Cheers
Avlesh

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, R. Tan <tanrihaed58@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Avlesh,
>
> I can't seem to get the scores right.
>
> I now have these types for the fields I'm targeting,
>
> <fieldType name="autoComplete" class="solr.TextField"
> positionIncrementGap="1">
>      <analyzer type="index">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
>        <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="20"/>
>      </analyzer>
>      <analyzer type="query">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
>      </analyzer>
>    </fieldType>
>    <fieldType name="autoComplete2" class="solr.TextField"
> positionIncrementGap="1">
>      <analyzer type="index">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
>        <filter class="solr.NGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="20"/>
>      </analyzer>
>      <analyzer type="query">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
>      </analyzer>
>    </fieldType>
>
> My query is this,
>
> q=*:*&fq=autoCompleteHelper:cha+autoCompleteHelper2:cha&qf=autoCompleteHelper^10.0+autoCompleteHelper2^1.0
>
> What should I tweak from the above config and query?
>
> Thanks,
> Rih
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, R. Tan <tanrihaed58@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I will have to pass on this and try your suggestion first. So, how does
> > your suggestion (1 and 2) boost the my startswith query? Is it because of
> > the n-gram filter?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Sandeep Tagore <sandeep.tagore@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Yes it can be done but it needs some customization. Search for custom
> sort
> >> implementations/discussions.
> >> You can check...
> >>
> >>
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html
> >> .
> >> Let us know if you have any issues.
> >>
> >> Sandeep
> >>
> >>
> >> R. Tan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This might work and I also have a single value field which makes it
> >> > cleaner.
> >> > Can sort be customized (with indexOf()) from the solr parameters
> alone?
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Scoring-for-specific-field-queries-tp25798390p25799055.html
> >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message