lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>
Subject Re: Replicating multiple cores
Date Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:17:25 GMT
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Jason Rutherglen
<jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though.
>
> Is there a reason?  I understand it's new etc, however I think one
> issue with it is it's somewhat non-native access to the filesystem.
> Can you illustrate a real world advantage other than the enhanced
> admin screens?
Complexity is the main problem w/ rsync based replication. you have to
manage so many processes and monitor them separately. The other
problem is managing snapshots. These snapshots need to be cleaned up
every now and then. You do not have enough info on what is
heppening/happened
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> <shalinmangar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
>> jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If I've got multiple cores on a server, I guess I need multiple
>>> rsyncd's running (if using the shell scripts)?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com

Mime
View raw message