lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: performance question
Date Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:28:47 GMT

On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:04 AM, A. Steven Anderson wrote:

>>
>> dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the number of actaul field  
>> names
>> you sort on makes it worse.
>>
>> If you sort on 100 fields, the cost is the same regardless of  
>> wether all
>> 100 of those fields exist because of a single <dynamicField/>  
>> declaration,
>> or 100 distinct <field/> declarations.
>>
>
> Ahh...thanks for the clarification.
>
> So, in general, there is no *significant* performance difference  
> with using
> dynamic fields. Correct?

Correct.  There's not even really an "insignificant" performance  
difference.  A dynamic field is the same as a regular field in  
practically every way on the search side of things.

	Erik


Mime
View raw message