lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Noveski <dr.m...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr spellchecker field
Date Fri, 28 May 2010 09:00:09 GMT
Thank you very much!

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatcher@gmail.com>wrote:

> A field used to build a spellcheck index only needs to be indexed, not
> stored.
>
> But, your PHP issue could be alleviated anyway by simply customizing the fl
> parameter and excluding the large stored field.  This is often desirable for
> large fields that are never needed fully in the UI, but used internally for
> highlighting.
>
>        Erik
>
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 4:47 AM, Dejan Noveski wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> Does the field that is used for spellchecker indexing need to be stored
>> and/or indexed? These fields became fairly large in my index, and php wont
>> parse/decode the documents returned.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Dejan Noveski
>> Web Developer
>> dr.mote@gmail.com
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/dekomote | LinkedIn:
>> http://mk.linkedin.com/in/dejannoveski
>>
>
>


-- 
--
Dejan Noveski
Web Developer
dr.mote@gmail.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dekomote | LinkedIn:
http://mk.linkedin.com/in/dejannoveski

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message