lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Joiner <thomas.b.joi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: how to create a custom type in Solr
Date Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:01:24 GMT
Sorry to bother you, but since I haven't had a reply in a week, I figured
I'd try asking again...

What build of Solr are you using personally?  Are you just using a nightly
build, or is there a specific build that you are using?  Has it had any
major screw-ups for you?

And I still would love to see your code.

Regards,
Thomas

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Thomas Joiner <thomas.b.joiner@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'd love to see your code on this, however what I've really been wondering
> is the following: When did AbstractSubTypeFieldType get added?  It isn't in
> 1.4.1 (as far as I can tell that's the latest one that is bundled on their
> site).  So, do I just need to grab it from subversion, and build it?  And if
> so, is there a particular revision that I should go with?  Or should I just
> pull trunk and use that, and last of all, is trunk stable enough to be used
> in production?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Mark Allan <mark.allan@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2010, at 1:01 pm, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>>
>>  Mark,
>>>
>>> A good way to get your changes/improvements into Solr is by putting them
>>> in
>>> JIRA.  Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Otis
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Otis,
>>
>> For the class which requires only minor modifications, I tested it to
>> ensure it doesn't break existing compatibility/functionality, and then I
>> created an issue in JIRA and uploaded a patch:
>>        https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1986
>>
>> I then posted a message about it to the list and got the following
>> responses.
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2010, at 6:24 pm, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Originally, I had intended that it was just for one Field Sub Type,
>>>> thinking that if we ever wanted multiple sub types, that a new, separate
>>>> class would be needed
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right - this was my original thinking too.  AbstractSubTypeFieldType is
>>> only a convenience class to create compound types... people can do it other
>>> ways.
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> When I replied to ask if that meant the changes wouldn't be included, I
>> got no response. As there's been no activity in JIRA, I didn't bother
>> putting any of my other changes into JIRA as they all relied on that one.
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message