lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@buyways.nl>
Subject RE: Re: Facet Fields - ID vs. Display Value
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:18:01 GMT
Well, you can do both, of cource but there's no need for additional code if you get it for
free. I'd prefer - as most i assume - to use the label as a facet field.
 
-----Original message-----
From: Frank A <fsa317@gmail.com>
Sent: Tue 10-08-2010 01:11
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; 
Subject: Re: Facet Fields - ID vs. Display Value

What I meant (which I realize now wasn't very clear) was if I have
something like categoryID and categorylabel - is the normal practice
to define categoryID as the facet field and then have the UI layer
display the label?  Or would it be normal to directly use
categorylabel as the facet field?



On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that.
> If the question is about what should be shown in the UI, it should be something
> pretty and human-readable, such as the original facet string value, assuming it
> was nice and clean.
>
> Otis
> ----
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Frank A <fsa317@gmail.com>
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 5:19:57 PM
>> Subject: Facet Fields - ID vs. Display Value
>>
>> Is there a general best practice on whether facet fields should be on
>> "IDs"  or "Display values"?
>>
>> -Frank
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message