lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com>
Subject Re: Upgrading solr from 3.3 to 3.4
Date Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:59:23 GMT
Thanks Erick.


On 19 September 2011 15:10, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatcher@gmail.com> wrote:

> Reindexing is not necessary.  Drop in 3.4 and go.
>
> For this sort of scenario, it's easy enough to try using a copy of your
> <SOLR_HOME> directory with an instance of the newest release of Solr.  If
> the release notes don't say a reindex is necessary, then it's not, but
> always a good idea to try it and run any tests you have handy.
>
>        Erik
>
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 00:02 , Isan Fulia wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > Ya we need to upgrade but my question is whether  reindexing of all cores
> is
> > required
> > or
> > we can directly use already indexed data folders of solr 3.3 to solr 3.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Isan Fulia.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19 September 2011 11:03, Wyhw Whon <wyhw@microgle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already using Apache Lucene 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3, we strongly
> >> recommend you upgrade to 3.4.0 because of the index corruption bug on
> >> OS or computer crash or power loss (LUCENE-3418), now fixed in 3.4.0.
> >>
> >> 2011/9/19 Isan Fulia <isan.fulia@germinait.com>
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Does upgrading solr from 3.3 to 3.4 requires reindexing of all the
> cores
> >> or
> >>> we can directly copy the data folders to
> >>> the new solr ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>> Isan Fulia.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Isan Fulia.
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message