lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Brown <...@intelcompute.com>
Subject Re: overriding qf in q affecting boosts
Date Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:44:27 GMT
Thanks Tomás,

My example should have read...

q=+(field1:this field1:that) +(field2:other)

I'm using edismax.

so with this approach, the boosts as specified in solrconfig qf will
remain in place?


---

IntelCompute
Web Design & Local Online Marketing

http://www.intelcompute.com

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:17:59 -0300, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
<tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert, the answer depends on the query parser you are using. If you are
> using the "edismax" query parser, then the "qf" will only be used when you
> don't specify any field in the "q" parameter. In your example the result
> query will be, boolean queries for "this" and "that" in the field1 and a
> DisMax query for the term "other" in fields (and the boost) you specify in
> qf.
> 
> If you use "dismax" the field in the query will not be considered and if
> you use LuceneQP the qf are not considered and it is going to use the
> default search field for the term "other" and no boost.
> 
> You can see this very easily turning on the "debugQuery".
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tomás
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Robert Brown <rob@intelcompute.com> wrote:
> 
>> If I have a set list in solrconfig for my "qf" along with their boosts,
>> and I then specify field names directly in q (where I could also override
>> the boosts), are the boosts left in place, or reset to 1?
>>
>>
>> <str name="qf">
>>  this^3
>>  that^2
>>  other^9
>> </str>
>>
>>
>> ie q=field1:+(this that) +(other)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> IntelCompute
>> Web Design & Local Online Marketing
>>
>> http://www.intelcompute.com
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message