lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: soft commit
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:43:02 GMT
Address the points I brought up or don't reply with funny name calling.

Below are two key points reiterated and re-articulated is an easy to answer way:

* Multi-select faceting is per-segment (true or false)

* Filters are cached per-segment (true or false)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Jason Rutherglen
> <jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yikes.  I'd love to see a test showing that un-inverted field cache
>> (which is for ALL segments as a single unit) can be used efficiently
>> with NRT / soft commit.
>
> Please stop being a troll.
> Solr as multiple faceting methods - only one uses un-inverted field cache.
>
> Oh, and for the record, Solr does have a faceting method in trunk that
> caches per-segment.
> There are always tradeoffs though - string faceting per-segment will
> always be slower than string faceting over the complete index (due to
> the cost of merging per-segment counts).
>
> Anyway, disabling any of those caches won't make anything any
> faster... the data structures will still be built, they just won't be
> reused.
> Seems like you realized your original statement was erroneous and have
> just reverted to troll state, trying to find something to pick at.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com

Mime
View raw message