lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <>
Subject Re: Solr3.5 Vs Solr4.1 - Help please
Date Fri, 01 Mar 2013 01:45:14 GMT
First, did the index you moved get built with 3.x? In that case the fields
won't be compressed. And things will be slower due 4.1 having to go through
the back-compat layer. If you did do this, try optimizing since that'll
re-write the index in 4.1 format (I'm pretty sure at least).

Second, fl _does_ matter, especially if you have lazy field loading
enabled. Basically you'll have to load/uncompress all the fields mentioned
in the fl list.


On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:53 PM, adityab <> wrote:

> thanks Shawn,
> I did try with specifying a fixed set of fl and with no score none gave any
> better performance.
> We have a different VM with same index and Solr4.1 on Jboss 5.1 which does
> perfectly fine with all the queries. So this is confusing us a bit more.
> Have our VM expert to look now hopefully to find some solution.
> Aditya
> --
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message