lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Vaillancourt <...@elementspace.com>
Subject Re: {soft}Commit and cache flusing
Date Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:28:02 GMT
Apologies all. I think the suggestion that I was replying "to get noticed"
is what erked me, otherwise I would have moved on. I'll follow this advice.

Cheers,

Tim


On 9 October 2013 05:20, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim:
>
> I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a post with the subject:
>
> {soft}Commit and cache flushing
>
> but going in a different direction, it's easy for people to think "I'm
> not interested in that
> thread, I'll ignore it", thereby missing the fact that you're asking a
> somewhat different
> question that they might have information about. It's not about whether
> you're
> doing anything particularly wrong with the question. It's about making
> it easy for
> people to help.
>
> See http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Tim Vaillancourt <tim@elementspace.com>
> wrote:
> > I have a genuine question with substance here. If anything this
> > nonconstructive, rude response was "to get noticed". Thanks for
> > contributing to the discussion.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > On 8 October 2013 05:31, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim,
> >> I suggest you open a new thread and not reply to this one to get
> noticed.
> >> Dmitry
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Tim Vaillancourt <tim@elementspace.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is there a way to make autoCommit only commit if there are pending
> >> changes,
> >> > ie: if there are 0 adds pending commit, don't autoCommit
> (open-a-searcher
> >> > and wipe the caches)?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Tim
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 2 October 2013 00:52, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > right. We've got the autoHard commit configured only atm. The
> >> > soft-commits
> >> > > are controlled on the client. It was just easier to implement the
> first
> >> > > version of our internal commit policy that will commit to all solr
> >> > > instances at once. This is where we have noticed the reported
> behavior.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Bram Van Dam <bram.vandam@intix.eu>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > if there are no modifications to an index and a softCommit or
> >> > hardCommit
> >> > > >>>> issued, then solr flushes the cache.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > > Indeed. The easiest way to work around this is by disabling auto
> >> > commits
> >> > > > and only commit when you have to.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message