lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: {soft}Commit and cache flusing
Date Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:25:26 GMT
Tim,

my suggestion was very concise, sorry for that. But not at all "rude" or
anything. Instead, tried to help you.

Dmitry


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Tim Vaillancourt <tim@elementspace.com>wrote:

> Apologies all. I think the suggestion that I was replying "to get noticed"
> is what erked me, otherwise I would have moved on. I'll follow this advice.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 9 October 2013 05:20, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tim:
> >
> > I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a post with the subject:
> >
> > {soft}Commit and cache flushing
> >
> > but going in a different direction, it's easy for people to think "I'm
> > not interested in that
> > thread, I'll ignore it", thereby missing the fact that you're asking a
> > somewhat different
> > question that they might have information about. It's not about whether
> > you're
> > doing anything particularly wrong with the question. It's about making
> > it easy for
> > people to help.
> >
> > See http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Tim Vaillancourt <tim@elementspace.com>
> > wrote:
> > > I have a genuine question with substance here. If anything this
> > > nonconstructive, rude response was "to get noticed". Thanks for
> > > contributing to the discussion.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8 October 2013 05:31, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tim,
> > >> I suggest you open a new thread and not reply to this one to get
> > noticed.
> > >> Dmitry
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Tim Vaillancourt <
> tim@elementspace.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Is there a way to make autoCommit only commit if there are pending
> > >> changes,
> > >> > ie: if there are 0 adds pending commit, don't autoCommit
> > (open-a-searcher
> > >> > and wipe the caches)?
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> > Tim
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 2 October 2013 00:52, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > right. We've got the autoHard commit configured only atm. The
> > >> > soft-commits
> > >> > > are controlled on the client. It was just easier to implement
the
> > first
> > >> > > version of our internal commit policy that will commit to all
solr
> > >> > > instances at once. This is where we have noticed the reported
> > behavior.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Bram Van Dam <
> bram.vandam@intix.eu>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > if there are no modifications to an index and a softCommit
or
> > >> > hardCommit
> > >> > > >>>> issued, then solr flushes the cache.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > > Indeed. The easiest way to work around this is by disabling
auto
> > >> > commits
> > >> > > > and only commit when you have to.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message