lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yannick <yann1...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Solr Cloud has lower performance with more servers
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:21:56 GMT
Hi Toke,

thanks for your suggestion - definitely an interesting idea. But unfortunately no, no indexing
job is running; those are static indexes being queried. The execution time is also very consistent
in each condition, I did quite a few tests.

Yann 


On Thursday, October 9, 2014 3:56 PM, Toke Eskildsen <te@statsbiblioteket.dk> wrote:
 


On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:06 +0200, Yannick wrote:


> I created a group of 2 Solr servers with a load-balancer in front
> (Haproxy). I have a batch client that sends requests (read-only)
> continuously to the load-balancer. The problem is: the performance is
> slower with 2 servers than it is with a single server (still via the
> load-balancer, with the second server down, so it's not the
> load-balancer itself causing the slowdown).

(speculating a lot here:)

Is another job updating the indexes while you are batch-searching?
If so, the slowdown could be explained by the servers disk caches being
flushed by the indexing job. When a request arrives some cache is
reclaimed, but is will be a battle between the update and the search
jobs. With more machines, there will be fewer request/machine, so the
search-cache has a lower chance of being used again before it is
reclaimed by the updater.

Still, worse performance for 2 machines sounds pretty bad.

- Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message