lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Naresh Yadav <nyadav....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr groups not matching with terms in a field
Date Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:10:59 GMT
thanks Ahmet..my problem solved...reason of slow performance of facet query
was : not doing setRows(0)..
once i done it then it came out in seconds like terms query.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iorixxx@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thats a different problem : speed-up faceting.
> Faceting used all over the place and it is fast. I suggest you looks for
> faceting improvements.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 16, 2015 11:17 AM, Naresh Yadav <nyadav.ait@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I tried facetting also but not worked smoothly for me. Case i had mentioned
> in email is dummy one and my actual index is with
> 12 lakh docs and 2 GB size on single machine. Each of tenant_pool field
> value has 20-30 tokens.
> Getting all terms in tenant_pool is fast in seconds but when i go with
> facet path after filter criteria then that is very slow. Because
> it is reading whole field from disk and i am only interested in terms.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iorixxx@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Naresh,
> >
> > Yup terms component does not respect q or fq parameter.
> > Luckily, thats easy with facet component. Example :
> > facet=true&facet.field=tenant_pool&q=type:1
> >
> > Please see more here :
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting
> >
> > happy faceting,
> > ahmet
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, January 16, 2015 10:13 AM, Naresh Yadav <nyadav.ait@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > Hi ahmet,
> >
> > Thanks, now i understand better, i will not try my usecase with grouping.
> > Actually i am interested in unique terms in a field i.e tenant_pool.
> That i
> > get perfectly with http://www.imagesup.net/?di=614212438580
> >
> > But i am not able to get terms after applying some filter say "type":"1".
> > That is I need unique terms in "tenant_pool" field for "type":"1" query
> and
> > answer will be P1, L1.
> > Please suggest me if i can get this with out reading each doc from disk.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iorixxx@yahoo.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Naresh,
> > >
> > > I have never grouped on a tokenised field and I am not sure it makes
> > sense
> > > to do so.
> > >
> > > Reading back ref-guide it says this about group.field parameter
> > >
> > > "The name of the field by which to group results. The field must be
> > > single-valued, and either be indexed or a field type that has a value
> > > source and works in a function query, such as ExternalFileField. It
> must
> > > also be a string-based field, such as StrField or TextField"
> > >
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping
> > >
> > > Therefore, it should be single valued. P.S. Don't get confused with
> > > TextField type, for example it could create single token when used with
> > > keyword tokenizer.
> > >
> > > Ahmet
> > >
> > > On Friday, January 16, 2015 4:43 AM, Naresh Yadav <
> nyadav.ait@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > Hi ahmet,
> > >
> > > If you observe output ngroups is 1 and returning only one group P1.
> > > But my expectation is it should return three groups P1, L1, L2 as my
> > > field is tokenized with space.
> > >
> > > Please correct me if wrong?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/15/15, Ahmet Arslan <iorixxx@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Naresh,
> > > >
> > > > Everything looks correct, what is the problem here?
> > > >
> > > > If you want to see more than one document per group, there is a
> > parameter
> > > > for that which defaults to 1.
> > > >
> > > > Ahmet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:02 AM, Naresh Yadav <
> > > nyadav.ait@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I had done following configuration to test Solr grouping concept.
> > > >
> > > > solr version :  4.6.1 (tried in latest version 4.10.3 also)
> > > > Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
> > > > Solrj code to insert docs :
> > > http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
> > > > Response Group's :  http://www.imagesup.net/?di=1114212438351
> > > > Response Terms' : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=614212438580
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if am i doing something wrong her
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message