lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Using physical schema.xml (ClassicIndexSchemaFactory) in Solr 5.0
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 03:16:40 GMT
Hi Alex,

Thanks for the information. The file got indexed correctly according to the
physical schema.xml when I use the conf from the techproducts example.

Regards,
Edwin


On 17 March 2015 at 21:56, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com> wrote:

> You might be better off starting with techproducts example instead of
> schemaless, if physical schema is what you actually want.
>
> You are probably hitting an issue with UpdateRequestProcessor chain
> that tries to automatically create fields.
>
> Regards,
>    Alex.
> ----
> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 17 March 2015 at 03:30, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinyeozl@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I've changed from the default schemaFactory
> > class="ManagedIndexSchemaFactory" to using the ClassicIndexSchemaFactory.
> >
> > However, I'm getting the exception on
> *org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
> > This IndexSchema is not mutable*, when I try to do the indexing.
> >
> > Is there other settings that I need to change so that I can use the
> > physical schema.xml (the ClassicIndexSchemaFactory) instead of using the
> > ManagedIndexSchemaFactory?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Edwin
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message