lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr TCP layer
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:18:27 GMT
Saumitra:

We certainly don't mean to be overly discouraging, so have at it!
There has been some talk of using Netty in the future as we pull the
war-file distribution out of the distro. Now, I have no technical clue
about the merits .vs. TCP. But that's another possibility you might
want to put into your analysis.

Best,
Erick

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Saumitra Srivastav
<saumitra.srivastav7@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the responses.
>
> My motivation for TCP is coming from a very heavy indexing pipeline where
> the smallest of optimization matters. I am working on a machine data parser
> which feeds data into Cassandra and Solr and we have SLAs based on how fast
> we can make data available in both the sources. We used to have issues with
> Cassandra as well but we optimized the s**t out of it.
>
> Now we want to do the same with Solr. While I do realize that this is going
> to be a lot of work, but if its something that will reap benefit in long
> run, then so be it. Datastax provides a netty based layer in their
> enterprise version which folks have reported to be faster. Now just because
> a commercial vendor ships it, doesn't mean we will jump into it without
> thinking. We will definitely do a effect-vs-effort analysis before
> committing to this.
>
> For majority of users, such high performance might not be a
> requirement/priority, so I understand the reluctance to go down this path.
>
> I think it would be best at this time that I start exploring this option and
> get back with my analysis.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Saumitra
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-TCP-layer-tp4191715p4192176.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message