lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Makailol Charls <4extrama...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr Document expiration with TTL
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:02:06 GMT
Hi,

As suggested, we could manage to activate the document expiration using TTL
by shifting the newly added URP setting in the starting of the
add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema URP. That populates the "expire_at_dt"
field and makes document to expire after defined TTL.

Many Thanks,
Makailol

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
wrote:

>
> : There were no changes made in the solrconfig.xml file except added that
> : <updateRequestProcessorChain
> default="true"></updateRequestProcessorChain>
> : block.
>
> ok, first off: if you already *had* another updateRequestProcessorChain
> that said 'default="true"' just adding a new one would be weird and would
> likely give you errors.  you have t oconsider the whole context of the
> config and the other updateRequestProcessorChains when you make edits like
> that.
>
> : <initParams path="/update/**">
> : <lst name="defaults">
> :     <str name="update.chain">add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema</str>
> : </lst>
> : </initParams>
>
> so that says whe nyou make any requests to a "/update" handler, it's going
> to use a default request param of
> update.chain=add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema.
>
> so your updates are not going to the default hanler (which you didn't give
> a name) they are going though the <updateRequestProcessorChain/> with the
> name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema"
>
> you should probably remove the chain you added, and instead put the new
> processors you want in the add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema chain.
>
> that's the simplest way to get what you want in place.
>
>
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message