lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Pendlebury <greg.pendleb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: edismax parsing confusion
Date Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:36:37 GMT
Try declaring your mm as 1 then and see if that assumption is correct.
Default 'mm' values are complicated to describe and depend on a variety of
factors. Generally if you want it to be a certain value, just declare it.

On 5 April 2017 at 02:07, Abhishek Mishra <solrmishra@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello guys
> sorry for late response. @steve I am using solr 5.2 .
> @greg i am using default mm from config file(According to me it is default
> mm is 1).
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Greg Pendlebury <greg.pendlebury@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > eDismax uses 'mm', so knowing what that has been set to is important, or
> if
> > it has been left unset/default you would need to consider whether 'q.op'
> > has been set. Or the default operator from the config file.
> >
> > Ta,
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On 3 April 2017 at 23:56, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Abhishek,
> > >
> > > Which version of Solr are you using?
> > >
> > > I can see that the parsed queries are different, but they’re also very
> > > similar, and there’s a lot of detail there - can you be more specific
> > about
> > > what the problem is?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > >
> > > > On Apr 3, 2017, at 4:54 AM, Abhishek Mishra <solrmishra@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > > i am running solr query with these parameter
> > > >
> > > > bf: "sum(product(new_popularity,100),if(exists(third_price),50,0))"
> > > > qf: "test_product^5 category_path_tf^4 product_id gender"
> > > > q: "handbags between rs150 and rs 400"
> > > > defType: "edismax"
> > > >
> > > > parsed query is like below one
> > > >
> > > > for q:-
> > > > (+(DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:handbags^4.0 |
> > gender:handbag |
> > > > test_product:handbag^5.0 | product_id:handbags))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:between^4.0 | gender:between |
> > > > test_product:between^5.0 | product_id:between))
> > > > +DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:rs150^4.0 | gender:rs150 |
> > > > test_product:rs150^5.0 | product_id:rs150))
> > > > +DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:rs^4.0 | gender:rs |
> > > > test_product:rs^5.0 | product_id:rs))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:400^4.0 | gender:400 |
> > > > test_product:400^5.0 | product_id:400))) DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"
> > > handbags
> > > > between rs150 ? rs 400")) (DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"handbags
> > between"))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"between rs150"))
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"rs
> > > > 400"))) (DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"handbags between rs150"))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"between rs150"))
> > > DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"rs150 ?
> > > > rs")) DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"? rs 400")))
> > > > FunctionQuery(sum(product(float(new_popularity),const(
> > > 100)),if(exists(float(third_price)),const(50),const(0)))))/no_coord
> > > >
> > > > but for dismax parser it is working perfect:
> > > >
> > > > (+(DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:handbags^4.0 |
> > gender:handbag |
> > > > test_product:handbag^5.0 | product_id:handbags))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:between^4.0 | gender:between |
> > > > test_product:between^5.0 | product_id:between))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:rs150^4.0 | gender:rs150 |
> > > > test_product:rs150^5.0 | product_id:rs150))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((product_id:and))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:rs^4.0 | gender:rs |
> > > > test_product:rs^5.0 | product_id:rs))
> > > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((category_path_tf:400^4.0 | gender:400 |
> > > > test_product:400^5.0 | product_id:400))) DisjunctionMaxQuery(("":"
> > > handbags
> > > > between rs150 ? rs 400"))
> > > > FunctionQuery(sum(product(float(new_popularity),const(
> > > 100)),if(exists(float(third_price)),const(50),const(0)))))/no_coord
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *according to me difference between dismax and edismax is based on
> some
> > > > extra features plus working of boosting fucntions.*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Abhishek
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message