lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]" <daniel.da...@nih.gov>
Subject RE: Poll: Master-Slave or SolrCloud?
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:40:39 GMT
I am also very surprised.  Even though I am no longer using my solr-config-tool, the main thing
I like about SolrCloud is how easy it is to bring up a new collection and set up the schema
and fields that you want.   I also like that I don't need to manage replication in the solr
configuration.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Leir [mailto:rleir@leirtech.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Poll: Master-Slave or SolrCloud?

Shawn,
Would you consider writing this up in a blog?
Thanks -- Rick

On April 28, 2017 11:04:02 AM EDT, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>On 4/24/2017 8:58 AM, Otis Gospodnetić wrote:
>> I'm really really surprised here.  Back in 2013 we did a poll to see
>how
>> people were running Master-Slave (4.x back then) and SolrCloud was a
>bit
>> more popular than Master-Slave:
>> https://sematext.com/blog/2013/02/25/poll-solr-cloud-or-not/
>>
>> Here is a fresh new poll with pretty much the same question - How do
>you
>> run your Solr?
><https://twitter.com/sematext/status/854927627748036608> -
>> and guess what?  SolrCloud is *not* at all a lot more prevalent than 
>> Master-Slave.
>
>I don't use *either* for my primary Solr installs.  My indexes are 
>distributed, with sharding maintained by my indexing code.  Each copy 
>of the index is independently updated, rather than relying on Solr 
>features to replicate it.  There are things I can do with this setup 
>that would be much more difficult (and maybe impossible) with either 
>SolrCloud or master-slave replication.
>
>Thanks,
>Shawn

--
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com 
Mime
View raw message