lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Facet is not working while querying with group
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:23:47 GMT
No Shawn,
I download the latest solr again then run without installing by command
./bin/solr -c
after upload the fresh configset and create the new collection
Then create a single document in solr
after do atomic update
and the same error occurs again.


On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:53 PM Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 6/20/2017 11:01 PM, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> > If I am using docValues=false getting this exception
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Type mismatch: isBlibliShipping was
> > indexed with multiple values per document, use SORTED_SET instead at
> >
> org.apache.solr.uninverting.FieldCacheImpl$SortedDocValuesCache.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:799)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.solr.uninverting.FieldCacheImpl$Cache.get(FieldCacheImpl.java:187)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.solr.uninverting.FieldCacheImpl.getTermsIndex(FieldCacheImpl.java:767)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.solr.uninverting.FieldCacheImpl.getTermsIndex(FieldCacheImpl.java:747)
> > at
> > But if docValues=true then getting this error
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: unexpected docvalues type NUMERIC for
> > field 'isBlibliShipping' (expected=SORTED). Re-index with correct
> docvalues
> > type. at org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues.checkField(DocValues.java:212)
> > at org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues.getSorted(DocValues.java:264) at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.term.TermGroupFacetCollector$SV.doSetNextReader(TermGroupFacetCollector.java:129)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.search.SimpleCollector.getLeafCollector(SimpleCollector.java:33)
> > at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:659)
> at
> > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:472) at
> >
> org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getGroupedCounts(SimpleFacets.java:692)
> > at
> > org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:476)
> > at
> > org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:405)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.lambda$getFacetFieldCounts$0(SimpleFacets.java:803)
> >
> > It Only appear in case when we facet on group query normal facet works
> fine
> >
> > Also appears only when we atomically update the document.
>
> These errors look like problems that appear when you *change* the
> schema, but try to use that new schema with an existing Lucene index
> directory.  As Erick already mentioned, certain changes in the schema
> *require* completely deleting the index directory and
> restarting/reloading, or starting with a brand new index.  Deleting all
> documents instead of wiping out the index may leave Lucene remnants with
> incorrect metadata for the new schema.
>
> What you've said elsewhere in the thread is that you're starting with a
> brand new collection ... but the error messages suggest that we're still
> dealing with an index where you had one schema setting, indexed some
> data, then changed the schema without completely wiping out the index
> from the disk.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message