lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: querying vs. highlighting: complete freedom?
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2018 20:50:57 GMT
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:51 AM Arturas Mazeika <mazeika@gmail.com> wrote:
...

>  Similarly, there's the
> hl.qparser parameter, but the documentation of that parameter is not as
> rich (the documentation says, that the default value is lucene). I am
> wondering are there other alternatives available? In case you are referring
> to other components, can you add a reference to those?
>

I'll make these links to other part of the ref guide to make it easier to
investigate.


> With respect to your question, why I'd like to use the analysis-chain for
> highlighting. That is a very good question: our end users cannot yet
> distinguish between highlighting capability of solr/information retrieval
> and search of the occurrences of the query terms in the documents. It is a
> rather difficult situation I am in. It is cool that there's a JIRA or two
> on the the load-balancing side.
>

No, I mean that there's a JIRA issue pertaining to exposing offsets from
highlighting output.  And I think there's a JIRA issue pertaining to being
able to post arbitrary text and highlight it.

Cheers,
  David
-- 
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message