lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From S G <sg.online.em...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solrcloud 7.6 OOM due to unable to create native threads
Date Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:19:40 GMT
One approach could be to buffer the messages in Kafka before pushing to
Solr.
And then use "Kafka mirror" to replicate the messages to the other DC.
Now both DCs' Kafka pipelines are in sync by the mirror and you can run
storm/spark/flink etc jobs to consume local Kafka and publish to local Solr
clusters.
This moves the responsibility of DR-sync to something designed specifically
for this purpose - Kafka mirror.
However do not use more than an year old version of Kafka as they had lot
of issues with mirroring.


On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:43 PM Raji N <rajisolr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> What are you recommendations for SolrCloud DR strategy.
>
> Thanks,
> Raji
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 6:25 PM Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don’t recommend CDCR at this point, I think there better approaches.
> >
> > The root problem is that CDCR uses tlog files as a queueing mechanism.
> > If the connection between the DCs is broken for any reason, the tlogs
> grow
> > without limit. This could probably be fixed, but a better alternative is
> to
> > use something designed to insure messages (updates) are delivered to
> > separate DCs rathe than try to have CDCR re-invent that wheel.
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > > On Mar 29, 2020, at 6:47 PM, S G <sg.online.email@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is CDCR even recommended to be used in production?
> > > Or it was abandoned before it could become production ready ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > SG
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 5:18 AM Erick Erickson <
> erickerickson@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> What that error usually means is that there are a zillion threads
> > running.
> > >>
> > >> Try taking a thread dump. It’s _probable_ that it’s CDCR, but
> > >> take a look at the thread dump to see if you have lots of
> > >> threads that are running. Any by “lots” here, I mean 100s of threads
> > >> that reference the same component, in this case that have cdcr in
> > >> the stack trace.
> > >>
> > >> CDCR is not getting active work at this point, you might want to
> > >> consider another replication strategy if you’re not willing to fix
> > >> the code.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Erick
> > >>
> > >>> On Mar 29, 2020, at 4:17 AM, Raji N <rajisolr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> We running solrcloud 7.6  (with the patch #
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12969150)/SOLR-11724.patchon
> > >>> production on 7 hosts in  containers. The container memory is 48GB
,
> > heap
> > >>> is 24GB.
> > >>> ulimit -v
> > >>>
> > >>> unlimited
> > >>>
> > >>> ulimit -m
> > >>>
> > >>> unlimited
> > >>> We don't have any custom code in solr. We have set up  bidirectional
> > CDCR
> > >>> between primary and secondary Datacenter. Our secondary DC is very
> > >> unstable
> > >>> and many times many instances are down.
> > >>>
> > >>> We get below exception quite often. Is this because the CDCR
> connection
> > >> is
> > >>> broken.
> > >>>
> > >>> WARN  (cdcr-update-log-synchronizer-80-thread-1) [   ]
> > >>> o.a.s.h.CdcrUpdateLogSynchronizer Caught unexpected exception
> > >>>
> > >>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
> > >>>
> > >>>              at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:717)
> ~[?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.http.impl.client.IdleConnectionEvictor.start(IdleConnectionEvictor.java:96)
> > >>> ~[httpclient-4.5.3.jar:4.5.3]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.http.impl.client.HttpClientBuilder.build(HttpClientBuilder.java:1219)
> > >>> ~[httpclient-4.5.3.jar:4.5.3]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpClientUtil.createClient(HttpClientUtil.java:319)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpClientUtil.createClient(HttpClientUtil.java:330)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpClientUtil.createClient(HttpClientUtil.java:268)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpClientUtil.createClient(HttpClientUtil.java:255)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.<init>(HttpSolrClient.java:200)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$Builder.build(HttpSolrClient.java:957)
> > >>> ~[solr-solrj-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0 719cde97f84640faa1e3525690d262946571245f
> > >>> - nknize - 2018-12-07 14:47:53]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.CdcrUpdateLogSynchronizer$UpdateLogSynchronisation.run(CdcrUpdateLogSynchronizer.java:139)
> > >>> [solr-core-7.6.0.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT
> > >>> 34d82ed033cccd8120431b73e93554b85b24a278 - i843100 - 2019-09-30
> > >>> 14:02:46]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> > >>> [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>>              at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_211]
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Raji
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message