mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Stuart <david.stu...@progressivealliance.co.uk>
Subject Re: download mahout-0.2 release
Date Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:22:48 GMT
+1 for this. while I'm fine compiling for source this turned out to be  
painful when I chose learning mahout as my entertainment on a 4 hour  
train journey not much fun using maven via 3G

David

On 9 Dec 2009, at 19:29, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com> wrote:

> We might consider building separate source release and binary  
> releases,
> following the example from lucene: http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/
>
> The src release wouldn't be substantially different from what we  
> currently
> distribute as the main release, while the binary release would include
> everything included in the source releases with the exception of the  
> sources
> and the addition of the jars. Wrapping the jars up into a single  
> bundle with
> examples and accompanying documentation would be a nice step forward,
> currently each of the artifacts must be downloaded independently.
>
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/>Drew
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> So another thought on this: should we just provide jars as part of a
>> distribution
>> via a simple link on lucene.apache.org/mahout?
>>
>> So that people don't need to build from source?
>>
>> I mean, if we want to include artifacts, why not just put them on  
>> the site
>> for download?
>>
>> -jake
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 here too -- I opened
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-215to
>>> track it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:55 AM, F.Ozgur Catak <f.ozgur.catak@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 :)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Isabel Drost <isabel@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Yeah I think we should just include the .jars next time for
>>>>>>> convenience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> -jake
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message