mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: download mahout-0.2 release
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:47:47 GMT
Keep in mind that we may not be able to redistribute all jars, which is why we rely on Maven,
for better or worse.

-Grant

On Dec 9, 2009, at 6:22 PM, David Stuart wrote:

> +1 for this. while I'm fine compiling for source this turned out to be painful when I
chose learning mahout as my entertainment on a 4 hour train journey not much fun using maven
via 3G
> 
> David
> 
> On 9 Dec 2009, at 19:29, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> We might consider building separate source release and binary releases,
>> following the example from lucene: http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/
>> 
>> The src release wouldn't be substantially different from what we currently
>> distribute as the main release, while the binary release would include
>> everything included in the source releases with the exception of the sources
>> and the addition of the jars. Wrapping the jars up into a single bundle with
>> examples and accompanying documentation would be a nice step forward,
>> currently each of the artifacts must be downloaded independently.
>> 
>> <http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/>Drew
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> So another thought on this: should we just provide jars as part of a
>>> distribution
>>> via a simple link on lucene.apache.org/mahout?
>>> 
>>> So that people don't need to build from source?
>>> 
>>> I mean, if we want to include artifacts, why not just put them on the site
>>> for download?
>>> 
>>> -jake
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 here too -- I opened
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-215to
>>>> track it.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:55 AM, F.Ozgur Catak <f.ozgur.catak@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Isabel Drost <isabel@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yeah I think we should just include the .jars next time for
>>>>>>>> convenience.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 from me as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -jake
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 



Mime
View raw message