mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Popularity of recommender items
Date Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:51:15 GMT
I'd like to see cross-recommendations added too.

But I also want some automation of the steps required to build a simple
recommender like the solr/mahout example Ted and Ellen have in their
pamphlet.

Lowering the barrier to entry by providing a sample pipeline would help a
lot of folks get started and hopefully would keep them interested.  Perhaps
in examples/bin?


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:

> There's been work done on the cross-recommender. There is a Mahout-style
> XRecommenderJob that has two preference models for two actions or
> preference types. It uses matrix multiply to get a cooccurrence type
> similarity matrix. If we had a cross-row-similarity-job, it could pretty
> easily be integrated and I'd volunteer to integrate it. The XRSJ is
> probably beyond me right now so if we can scare up someone to do that we'd
> be a long way down the road.
>
> I'll put a feature request into Jira and take this to the dev list
>
> BTW this is already integrated with the solr-recommender.
>
> On Feb 8, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have different opinions about each piece.
>
> I think that cross recommendation is as core as RowSimilarityJob and should
> be a parallel implementation or integrated.  Parallel is probably easier.
> It is even plausible to have a version of RowSimilarityJob that doesn't
> support all the different distance measures but does support multiple cross
> and direct processing using LLR or related cooccurrence based measures.  It
> would be very cool if a single pass over the data could do many kinds of co
> or cross occurrence operations.
>
> For dithering, it really is post processing.  That said, it is also the
> single largest improvement that anybody typically gets when testing
> different options so it is a bit goofy to not have good support for some
> kinds of dithering.
>
> For Thompson sampled recommenders, I am not sure where to start hacking on
> our current code.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>
> > That was by no means to criticize effort level, which has been impressive
> > especially during the release.
> >
> > It was more a question about the best place to add these things and
> > whether they are important. Whether people see these things as custom
> post
> > processing or core.
> >
> > On Feb 8, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > The reason that we aren't adding this like cross-rec and other things is
> > that "we" have full-time jobs, mostly.  Suneel is full-time on Mahout,
> but
> > the rest are not.  You seem more active than most.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message