mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pat Ferrel <...@occamsmachete.com>
Subject Re: Removing MAHOUT_LOCAL option
Date Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:29:32 GMT
Are we just talking about Hadoop Mapreduce? I thought is was ignored when using Spark. 

On Mar 20, 2016, at 8:20 AM, alok tanna <tannaalok@gmail.com> wrote:

-1 MAHOUT_LOCAL  is very useful for quick POC .

Thanks,
Alok Tanna
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 20, 2016, at 5:01 AM, Mihai Dascalu <mihai.dascalu@cs.pub.ro> wrote:
> 
> -1 I still use it for fast deployment and it’s really helpful for small local processing
> 
> Have a great weekend!
> Mihai
> 
>> On 20 Mar 2016, at 06:13, Suneel Marthi <suneel.marthi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 to remove this
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 
>>> We're discussing removing the MAHOUT_LOCAL option in order to trim artifact
>>> sizes.
>>> 
>>> If you think keeping the option to use MAHOUT_LOCAL for testing with the
>>> single-node mode of Hadoop is important please let us know. It can be handy
>>> for trying things out but it would be nice to ditch the effort required to
>>> maintain it.
>>> 
>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1705 for more context.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
> 


Mime
View raw message