mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Removing MAHOUT_LOCAL option
Date Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:45:33 GMT
Yes I agree; will leave the question open a couple days.

On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:

> Maybe a better user question is: How many people are still using the
> deprecated Hadoop code?
>
> If the number is small +1 for removal.
>
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> To clarify, the MAHOUT_LOCAL option only works for legacy Hadoop
> MapReduce-based jobs which officially became deprecated in 0.10.0.
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Yes as I understand it.
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> Are we just talking about Hadoop Mapreduce? I thought is was ignored
> when
> >> using Spark.
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2016, at 8:20 AM, alok tanna <tannaalok@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> -1 MAHOUT_LOCAL  is very useful for quick POC .
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alok Tanna
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 5:01 AM, Mihai Dascalu <mihai.dascalu@cs.pub.ro
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> -1 I still use it for fast deployment and it’s really helpful for small
> >> local processing
> >>>
> >>> Have a great weekend!
> >>> Mihai
> >>>
> >>>> On 20 Mar 2016, at 06:13, Suneel Marthi <suneel.marthi@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 to remove this
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We're discussing removing the MAHOUT_LOCAL option in order to trim
> >> artifact
> >>>>> sizes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you think keeping the option to use MAHOUT_LOCAL for testing
with
> >> the
> >>>>> single-node mode of Hadoop is important please let us know. It can
be
> >> handy
> >>>>> for trying things out but it would be nice to ditch the effort
> >> required to
> >>>>> maintain it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1705 for more
> >> context.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message